Tag: Malaysia Airlines

  • Malaysia Airlines Flight 653 (MH653): The Hijacking, Crash and Unresolved Mystery

    Malaysia Airlines Flight 653 (MH653) is one of the most tragic events in Malaysian aviation history. On 4 December 1977, what began as a routine domestic flight from Penang to Kuala Lumpur ended in a fatal hijacking and crash in Johor.

    All 100 people on board – 93 passengers and 7 crew – lost their lives when the Boeing 737-200 crashed into a mangrove swamp near Tanjung Kupang. Decades later, the identity and motive of the hijacker remain unknown, making MH653 one of Malaysia’s enduring aviation mysteries.

    This guide covers the full story of MH653, including the aircraft, timeline, hijacking, investigation, theories and long-term impact on Malaysia’s aviation safety landscape.

    Industry Context: Malaysian Aviation Before MH653

    To understand the impact of MH653, it helps to see where Malaysian aviation stood in the 1970s. Malaysian Airline System (MAS), the predecessor of today’s Malaysia Airlines, was still a relatively young carrier, having emerged after the split of Malaysia–Singapore Airlines.

    The airline was expanding its Boeing 737 fleet and building a reputation as a modern flag carrier serving domestic and regional routes. Penang–Kuala Lumpur services were important links for business travellers, civil servants and diplomats, with Penang International Airport serving as the departure point for MH653.

    During the 1970s, aircraft hijackings had become an increasing international security concern, prompting airlines and governments worldwide to strengthen aviation security procedures. MH653 contributed to growing awareness of aviation security risks in Malaysia during an era when global airline security measures were evolving rapidly.

    Overview of Malaysia Airlines Flight 653

    • Flight: Malaysia Airlines Flight 653 (MH653)
    • Route: Penang (PEN) – Kuala Lumpur (Subang, SZB)
    • Date of accident: 4 December 1977
    • Aircraft type: Boeing 737-2H6
    • Registration: 9M-MBD
    • Operator: Malaysian Airline System (MAS)
    • Occupants: 100 (93 passengers, 7 crew)
    • Survivors: 0
    • Crash location: Tanjung Kupang, near Gelang Patah, Johor

    Before the hijacking, this was an ordinary evening domestic service. After the crash, MH653 became a significant event in Malaysia’s aviation history.

    The Aircraft: Boeing 737-2H6, 9M-MBD

    The aircraft operating MH653 was a Boeing 737-200, one of the most widely used short- to medium-haul jets in the world at that time.

    • Type: Boeing 737-2H6
    • Manufacturer’s serial number (MSN): 20559
    • Boeing line number: 306
    • Registration: 9M-MBD
    • Engines: 2 × Pratt & Whitney JT8D-15
    • First flight: 12 September 1972
    • Operator: Malaysian Airline System (MAS)

    The 737-200 was considered a reliable workhorse and formed the backbone of many airlines’ domestic fleets. There were no major technical issues publicly reported about 9M-MBD before the accident, and the flight departed Penang normally.

    The Crew of MH653

    The MH653 crew consisted of experienced flight deck officers and trained cabin crew.

    Flight deck

    • Captain G. K. Ganjoor, age 43, married with four children, with MAS since the Malaysia–Singapore Airlines era, trained in Seattle on jet operations, approximately 15,500 flying hours.
    • First Officer Kamarulzaman Jalil, age 25, single, joined MAS on 4 June 1974, upgraded to Boeing 737 on 4 October 1976, trained at Curug, Indonesia, approximately 1,866 flying hours, and a former Royal Military College student.

    Cabin crew

    • Karim Tahir – Steward
    • Onn Jaafar – Steward
    • Sharifah Sidah Syed Mohamad – Stewardess
    • Azian Borhanuddin – Stewardess

    The combination of an experienced captain and a younger but professionally trained first officer reflected a typical pairing of the era. By available accounts, the crew began the flight in normal operational condition.

    Passengers and High-Profile Figures

    Of the 93 passengers on board, several were prominent figures in government and diplomacy.

    • Datuk Seri Haji Ali bin Haji Ahmad – Minister of Agriculture
    • Tan Sri Mahfuz Khalid – Director-General, Public Works Department (JKR)
    • Datuk Haji Khalid Mohamad – Director, Military Works Division, JKR
    • Abu Bakar Othman Merican – Deputy Director, Fisheries Department
    • Hood Fadzil – Political Secretary to the Minister of Agriculture
    • Mario Garcia Inchaustegui and his wife – Cuban Ambassador to Malaysia and his spouse

    The presence of senior officials and foreign diplomats amplified the national and international impact of the tragedy.

    Timeline of Flight MH653

    The flight began as a standard domestic hop from Penang to Kuala Lumpur. The following timeline is based on publicly available sources, though exact times vary across historical accounts.

    • Around 7:21 pm – MH653 departs Penang International Airport with 93 passengers and 7 crew.
    • Around 7:47 pm – The pilot radios, “653 going around.” Soon after, the crew reports that a hijacker is on board.
    • Around 7:49 pm – The aircraft is cleared to land at Subang, but the situation intensifies.
    • Around 7:54 pm – The aircraft does not complete the approach and is reportedly diverted south toward Singapore.
    • Later – MH653 climbs to roughly 21,000 feet and begins abnormal manoeuvres.
    • Around 8:36 pm – Residents near Tanjung Kupang reported hearing a loud impact and later saw fire and wreckage in the mangrove area.

    This sequence transformed a routine domestic service into one of the most significant air disasters in Malaysian history.

    The Hijacking and Diversion

    After the initial approach toward Subang, the aircraft did not land. A demand was reportedly made to divert the flight to Singapore, and the jet climbed away from approach altitude before continuing south.

    This climb and diversion strongly suggest that control of the cockpit had been compromised or heavily influenced by the hijacker or hijackers.

    Inside the Cockpit

    The exact sequence inside the cockpit remains partly unknown. Published accounts and later summaries have suggested unusual sounds and possible disturbances in the cockpit shortly before communication ceased, although the exact sequence of events has never been conclusively established publicly.

    One theory proposed in later analyses is that the pilots may have been incapacitated during the hijacking, leaving the aircraft without qualified control. With no one capable of flying the Boeing 737, even minor control inputs could quickly lead to unstable flight conditions.

    Abnormal Manoeuvres and Final Descent

    As MH653 continued toward Singapore, radar reconstruction suggested unusual pitch-up and pitch-down movements. These oscillations point to loss of stable flight and possibly uncoordinated control inputs.

    The aircraft ultimately crashed into a mangrove swamp near Tanjung Kupang at very high speed during a steep descent. The forces involved were far beyond survivable limits.

    Response and Recovery

    Villagers and local authorities rushed toward the swamp after reports of the crash, finding wreckage and fires scattered through the mangroves. Search and recovery efforts were launched quickly, but there were no survivors.

    The difficult terrain and heavily fragmented wreckage complicated recovery and identification work. Investigators nonetheless recovered both flight recorders and important structural evidence needed to reconstruct the final sequence.

    Official Investigation and Report

    Malaysia’s Department of Civil Aviation led the investigation, supported by international aviation experts and Boeing representatives. The official findings concluded that the crew were fatally incapacitated during the hijacking and that the aircraft was no longer under professional control.

    The report confirmed that a hijacking had taken place but did not conclusively identify the individual or group responsible, nor establish a definitive motive. For external reference, researchers often consult the Aviation Safety Network record for MH653.

    Memorial and Mourning: Tanjung Kupang

    Because of the condition of the remains and the difficulty of individual identification, the victims were buried together in a mass grave.

    • Location: Jalan Kebun Teh, Johor Bahru
    • Name: Taman Peringatan Tanjung Kupang
    • Established: 8 December 1977
    • Built by: Johor State Government

    The burial ceremony involved leaders from multiple faiths, reflecting the diverse backgrounds of those on board. The memorial remains a place of remembrance for families, friends and the public.

    Human Stories and Unanswered Questions

    Behind every name on the manifest was a family left without clear answers. Decades later, some relatives still speak publicly about the long-term impact the tragedy had on their lives.

    That human dimension is a major reason MH653 continues to resonate beyond aviation history. It is not just an accident case; it remains significant for many families in Malaysia and abroad.

    Theories About the Hijackers

    Because the hijacker or hijackers were never officially identified, several theories have circulated over the years. These include possible links to the Japanese Red Army, Vietnamese militants, a targeted attack involving the Cuban ambassador, or a lone hijacker acting without wider organisational backing.

    None of these theories has been publicly confirmed with definitive evidence. As a result, MH653 continues to be regarded as one of Southeast Asia’s unresolved aviation cases.

    Impact on Malaysian Aviation Safety and Security

    MH653 influenced the development of aviation security protocols in Malaysia. In the years following the tragedy, measures were strengthened, including improvements to screening procedures, cockpit access controls and coordination between airlines, airports, regulators and law enforcement.

    For readers interested in how Malaysia’s aviation sector has developed since then, Aviation.MY’s coverage of MRO development and the wider network of aviation companies in Malaysia offers useful present-day context.

    MH653 in the Wider Story of Malaysian Aviation

    MH653 occupies a unique place in Malaysian aviation history. It was Malaysia Airlines’ first major fatal accident, one of the region’s earliest hijacking-related crashes, and an incident with diplomatic as well as political significance.

    It also remains officially unresolved in terms of hijacker identity and motive.

    Conclusion

    Malaysia Airlines Flight 653 remains a defining moment in Malaysia’s aviation history. A routine Penang–Kuala Lumpur flight became a hijack crisis and ended in a catastrophic crash in the mangroves of Tanjung Kupang.

    The loss of 100 lives, including senior government officials, diplomats, crew and passengers from many walks of life, had a profound impact on the nation. Decades later, official findings confirm a hijacking and crew incapacitation, but they still do not fully answer who carried out the act or why.

    The Tanjung Kupang memorial stands as a physical reminder of the tragedy, while modern Malaysian aviation reflects the progress made in aviation safety and security since 1977.

    References and Further Reading

  • Aviation Companies in Malaysia

    Aviation Companies in Malaysia: A Complete Guide to Airlines, MROs, and Aerospace Leaders (2026)

    Malaysia’s aviation industry is a vibrant engine of the nation’s economy, leveraging its strategic location in Southeast Asia to connect the region to the world. Beyond its role as a travel hub, the sector drives tourism, trade, and high-value manufacturing, making it a critical pillar of national growth. For aviation enthusiasts, investors, and job seekers, Malaysia offers a dynamic ecosystem of flag carriers, innovative low-cost airlines, robust Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) providers, and a growing aerospace manufacturing base.

    This guide explores the key players, regulatory framework, challenges, and future outlook of Malaysia’s aviation landscape, with a comprehensive list of companies categorized by sector. Dive deeper into related topics like the importance of MRO companies to the Malaysian economy or explore our full directory of aviation companies in Malaysia.


    Industry Overview: A Regional Powerhouse

    The Malaysian aviation sector is positioned as a crucial hub in the Asia-Pacific region, anchored by Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA)—one of Southeast Asia’s busiest airports, serving millions of passengers annually. The industry contributes significantly to Malaysia’s GDP and employs thousands across airlines, airports, MROs, and aerospace manufacturing.

    Key Industry Highlights (2024–2026):

    • Malaysia Airlines serves over 46 international destinations, connecting Malaysia to major global cities.
    • AirAsia operates as Asia’s largest low-cost carrier, flying to 166 destinations across 25 countries.
    • The Asia-Pacific region requires an estimated 17,485 new aircraft over the next decade due to soaring air travel demand.
    • Malaysia ranks among the top three MRO hubs in Asia-Pacific, servicing airlines globally with CAAM-approved facilities.

    The government’s liberalization of aviation policies and Open Skies Agreements has fostered competition, innovation, and increased connectivity, making Malaysia an attractive destination for travelers and investors alike.


    Key Players in Malaysian Aviation

    Airlines

    Malaysia Airlines Berhad
    The national flag carrier offers extensive domestic and international routes, renowned for safety, service quality, and a modernizing fleet including the Airbus A350 and A330neo. It is part of the Malaysia Aviation Group (MAG), which also owns MRO and engineering subsidiaries. Learn more about MAG’s brand portfolio on their official site.

    AirAsia Berhad
    Asia’s first and largest low-cost carrier, AirAsia has revolutionized regional air travel with affordable fares and a dense network. Its affiliate AirAsia X specializes in long-haul low-cost flights to Australia, the Middle East, and East Asia. Check out AirAsia’s latest newsroom updates for fleet and route announcements.

    Batik Air Malaysia (formerly Malindo Air)
    A full-service hybrid airline operating domestic and international flights across Asia-Pacific, South Asia, and the Middle East. It is part of the Indonesian Lion Air Group and offers a unique blend of low-cost efficiency and full-service comfort.

    Firefly
    A subsidiary of Malaysia Airlines, Firefly operates domestic and regional flights, focusing on short-haul routes and connecting secondary cities like Penang, Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport (Subang), and regional ASEAN destinations.

    MASwings
    Another MAG subsidiary, MASwings serves rural air routes in East Malaysia (Sabah and Sarawak), ensuring connectivity to remote communities under the Essential Air Service program.

    Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) Providers

    Malaysia’s MRO sector is a global leader, offering comprehensive services from airframe maintenance to engine overhaul. Key players include:

    • AIROD Services Sdn Bhd: One of the oldest and most established MRO providers in Malaysia, servicing a wide range of aircraft types.
    • Asia Digital Engineering (ADE): A Capital A subsidiary that recently unveiled Malaysia’s largest 14-line aircraft maintenance hangar, strengthening ASEAN maintenance capabilities.
    • Sepang Aircraft Engineering Sdn Bhd: Specializes in aircraft structural repairs and modifications; visit their website for services.
    • Raya Airways / Transmile Air Services: A major cargo and passenger aircraft MRO provider.
    • Hawker Pacific (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Honeywell Aerospace Services, GE Aviation Services (Malaysia), CTRM Sdn Bhd (composite aerostructures), and Weststar Aviation Services also operate prominent MRO facilities.

    Malaysia’s strategic location, skilled workforce, and CAAM-approved facilities make it a top choice for global airlines seeking cost-effective, high-quality maintenance services.

    Aerospace Manufacturing

    Malaysia is home to several firms producing components for global giants like Airbus and Boeing. Notable companies include:

    • Aerospace Technology Systems Corporation (ATSC): Engaged in precision aerospace manufacturing.
    • Composites Technology Research Malaysia (CTRM): Specializes in composite aerostructures, a critical area for next-generation aircraft.
    • Spirit AeroSystems Malaysia: A leading aerostructure manufacturer with a strong global presence.
    • Safran Malaysia: Operates two facilities focused on aerospace and defense.
    • Airbus Malaysia: Supplies civil aircraft components and support services, with nearly 400 aircraft on order in the region.

    The government’s Aerospace Industry Blueprint 2030 aims to elevate Malaysia’s position in the global aerospace supply chain through R&D, technology adoption, and public-private partnerships.


    Government Regulation and Strategic Initiatives

    The Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia (CAAM) oversees the regulatory framework, ensuring compliance with international safety standards (ICAO) and promoting sustainable aviation practices.

    Key Government Initiatives:

    • Open Skies Agreements: Enhance regional connectivity and competition.
    • Aerospace Industry Blueprint 2030: Focuses on R&D, technology development, and industry consolidation.
    • Malaysian Green Skies Initiative: Aims to reduce aviation emissions through sustainable fuels and operational efficiencies.
    • MAVCOM Regulations: The Malaysian Aviation Commission ensures fair competition and consumer protection in the sector.

    For more on regulatory bodies, visit the Ministry of Transport’s aviation agencies page.


    Challenges and Future Outlook

    Post-Pandemic Recovery

    Although air travel is rebounding, airlines still face fluctuating demand and operational constraints. Malaysia’s aviation sector is gathering pace, with growth accelerating in late 2023 and continuing into 2024.

    Sustainability and Green Aviation

    Climate change pressures are driving airlines and MROs to adopt greener practices, including sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), optimized flight paths, and energy-efficient hangars.

    Digitalization

    Digital transformation is reshaping ticketing, customer service, fleet management, and predictive maintenance. Airlines are investing in AI, big data, and IoT to enhance operational resilience.

    Human Resources

    A skills gap in technical and engineering roles remains a challenge. Efforts are underway to expand aviation training programs and attract talent through scholarships and vocational upskilling. Explore D’viation for pilot and aviation training opportunities.


    Complete List of Aviation Companies in Malaysia

    Airlines

    Malaysian Companies

    • AirAsia Berhad – Leading low-cost carrier
    • AirAsia X – Long-haul low-cost affiliate
    • Firefly (FlyFirefly Sdn Bhd) – Regional subsidiary of Malaysia Airlines
    • Malaysia Airlines Berhad – National flag carrier
    • Batik Air Malaysia – Full-service hybrid airline (formerly Malindo Air)
    • MASwings – Rural air services in East Malaysia

    International Companies with Malaysian Operations

    • AirAsia Indonesia
    • Indonesia AirAsia X
    • Thai AirAsia / Thai AirAsia X
    • Philippines AirAsia
    • AirAsia India
    • AirAsia Japan

    MRO Companies (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul)

    • AAR Landing Gear Services Sdn Bhd
    • Aerospace Technology Systems Corp. Sdn Bhd
    • AgustaWestland (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
    • Airfoil Services Sdn Bhd
    • AIROD Services Sdn Bhd
    • AJ Aeroservices Sdn Bhd
    • BHIC Aeroservices Sdn Bhd
    • CTRM Sdn Bhd (Composites Technology Research Malaysia)
    • Destini Berhad
    • GE Aviation Services (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
    • UTC Aerospace Systems (formerly Hamilton Sundstrand)
    • Hawker Pacific (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
    • Honeywell Aerospace Services
    • Interiors Aeroservices (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
    • KOP Aviation Sdn Bhd
    • Layang-layang Aerospace Sdn Bhd
    • MAS Aerospace Engineering (MAG)
    • MHS Aviation Berhad
    • Mycopter Aviation Services Sdn Bhd
    • Nusantara Aviation Services Sdn Bhd
    • Sepang Aircraft Engineering Sdn Bhd
    • Raya Airways Sdn Bhd (Transmile Air Services)
    • SAR Helicopters Sdn Bhd
    • Scandinavian Avionics (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
    • SME Aerospace Sdn Bhd
    • Solid Partners Sdn Bhd
    • SR Aviation Sdn Bhd
    • Systematic Aviation Services Sdn Bhd
    • Weststar Aviation Services Sdn Bhd
    • Yasmin Wings Sdn Bhd
    • Zetro Aerospace Corporation Sdn Bhd
    • Asia Digital Engineering (ADE) – Capital A subsidiary

    Aerospace Manufacturing & Defense

    • Aerospace Technology Systems Corporation
    • Composites Technology Research Malaysia (CTRM)
    • Spirit AeroSystems Malaysia Sdn Bhd
    • Safran Malaysia (two facilities)
    • Airbus Malaysia
    • Astronautic Technology (Malaysia)
    • Borneo SubOrbitals

    Training & Education

    • D’viation – Pilot and aviation training
    • Admal Aviation College
    • Malaysian Institute of Aviation Technology (MIAT)

    Is Malaysia’s Aviation Sector Worth Watching?

    Absolutely. With a blend of established airlines, innovative low-cost carriers, a top-tier MRO ecosystem, and a growing aerospace manufacturing base, Malaysia is poised to become a leading player in global aviation. Its strategic location, favorable regulatory environment, and commitment to sustainability make it an attractive hub for travelers, businesses, and professionals.

    As the industry adapts to post-pandemic recovery, digital transformation, and green aviation initiatives, the future looks promising for Malaysia’s aviation sector. For more insights, explore our articles on aviation careers and pilot training costs in Malaysia.

  • Malaysia Airlines Possible Acquisition: Go or No-go?

    Malaysia Airlines Possible Acquisition: Go or No-go?

    In late 2019, Malaysia Airlines Berhad (MAB) began to appear in Malaysian news headlines again. It was reported that the government has received several proposal with the aim of being a strategic partner to the ailing airline. The Malaysian Prime Minister, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad has reportedly said that all options need to be considered and some of the proposals is considered as “no-go”. The airline has been struggling to be profitable with years of transformation programme have yet to demonstrate significant success.

    Focus Malaysia reported that Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad said the government has received 5 proposals. While the newspaper has named the first four of them as AirAsia Group Berhad (AAGB), Japan Airlines (JAL), Air France-KLM SA and Malindo Airways Sdn Bhd (Malindo). The fifth proposal has yet to be ascertained from the news reports.

    Japan Airlines Co Ltd (JAL)

    Japan Airlines is proposing an RM 1.12 bil of cash injection into Malaysia Airlines. In return, it will have a 25% stake in MAB. However, it was reported that the synergy will not be sufficient to cover losses incurred by MAB.

    AirAsia Group

    Focus Malaysia reported that AAGB estimates synergies of RM 1.4 bil per year. Besides, the synergy is also expected to solve industry’s overcapacity as well as enabling access to AirAsia’s digital and other aviation business.

    There are several concerns on the merger or synergy. The first one is a possible monopoly, given the significance of market share both of them have for Malaysian domestic and Southeast Asia regional destinations. The second one is about the access to AirAsia’s digital and other aviation business. This part of AAGB is expected to bring in more revenues compared to the AirAsia airline business itself. Therefore, MAB may not have a bright future as far as profit is concerned.

    Air France-KLM

    Being a European carrier, the synergy is expected to bring in more benefits to the airlines in terms of maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO).

    Malaysia Airlines has been seeing itself in red for so many years already. IN 2014, it was taken private by Khazanah as part of a multi-year restructuring exercise by the Malaysian government.

    Malindo Airways

    Malindo offers a one-year “trial period” before the final decision on merger takes place. It hopes that the scale of economies will help both airlines save cost and earn a better revenue.

    Go or No-go?

    The first foreign CEO appointed during the restructuring exercise was Christoph Mueller, who then resigned before his contract tenure ends with Malaysia Airlines. The optimists may think that he will be successful in bringing the necessary changes to the airline. However, his premature resignation has led the skeptics into believing that he was not successful in turning around the company to profitability.

    With MAB now is having a Malaysian as its CEO, we can only hope for the best for the airline. Perhaps it is the best time for everyone in the airline to think of what will be the best solution for the company to be profitable.

    Sources

    How JAL proposes to turn around Malaysia Airlines – Focus Malaysia

     

  • Malaysia Airlines MH 128 Flight Incident

    MELBOURNE, June 1st 2017: A Malaysian Airlines flight from Melbourne (MEL) to Kuala Lumpur (KUL) was asked to turn back to Melbourne due to an act of disruption by a single perpetrator. The flight, MH 128, departed from Melbourne at 11.11pm yesterday (31 May 2017).

    The disruptive passenger was allegedly trying to open the cockpit door. Fortunately, a number of brave passengers acted fast and managed to subdue the disruptive passenger before the passenger made it to the cockpit. While the event is unfolding, the flight crews managed to alert the pilots in the cockpit, resulting in the eventual turn back by the pilot.

    The airline gave a brief statement on its official site. Here is the full statement:

    MH128, which had departed Melbourne Airport at 11.11pm scheduled  to arrive Kuala Lumpur at 5.28am on 1 June, made a turn back to Melbourne after the operating Captain was alerted by a cabin crew of a passenger attempting to enter the cockpit.

    Malaysia Airlines would like to stress that at no point was the aircraft ‘hijacked’.

    MH128 safely landed in Melbourne airport at 11.41pm.

    Following the incident on MH128, the disruptive passenger has been apprehended by airport security. Malaysia Airlines together with the Australian authorities will be investigating the incident.

    Safety and security are of utmost priority to malaysia airlines. The airline wishes to apologise for the inconvenience caused.

    Passengers have safely disembarked the aircraft and will be screened by Australian authorities.

    They will be accommodated at hotels and offered on the next available flight or on other carriers.

    Updated as 12.19am (GMT+8), 1 Jun 2017.

     

     

  • Malaysia Airlines MH2718 Flight Incident

    SIBU – Saturday, April 8th 2017: A Malaysia Airlines Flight MH2718 carrying 61 passengers and 6 crew members has skidded on the runway of Sibu Airport upon landing at 10:17 PM that day.

    Sibu Airport 2015-03-27 16.17.04
    Sibu Airport 2015-03-27 16.17.04

    Everyone onboard had safely disembarked from the Boeing 737-800 aircraft via two side rafts. The cause of the incident is still unknown.

    April 10th 2017 Update: Malaysia Airports said the runway at Sibu Airport has been reopened at 0000 hrs on Sunday, April 9th 2017. Due to the runway closure, 48 lights and 3,787 passengers were affected.

    Source: The Star